Mercurial > ~dholland > hg > ag > index.cgi
diff anagram/agcore/rule.cpp @ 6:607e3be6bad8
Adjust to the moving target called the C++ standard.
Apparently nowadays it's not allowed to define an explicit copy
constructor but not an assignment operator. Consequently, defining the
explicit copy constructor in terms of the implicit/automatic
assignment operator for general convenience no longer works.
Add assignment operators.
Caution: not tested with the IBM compiler, but there's no particular
reason it shouldn't work.
author | David A. Holland |
---|---|
date | Mon, 30 May 2022 23:46:22 -0400 |
parents | 13d2b8934445 |
children |
line wrap: on
line diff
--- a/anagram/agcore/rule.cpp Mon May 30 23:32:56 2022 -0400 +++ b/anagram/agcore/rule.cpp Mon May 30 23:46:22 2022 -0400 @@ -44,6 +44,9 @@ Rule::Rule() : ObjectRegister<RuleDescriptor>() {} Rule::Rule(int x) : ObjectRegister<RuleDescriptor>(x) {} Rule::Rule(const Rule &t) : ObjectRegister<RuleDescriptor>(t) {} +void Rule::operator = (const Rule &t) { + ObjectRegister<RuleDescriptor>::operator = (t); +} RuleDescriptor &Rule::Map::operator [] (unsigned x) { @@ -216,7 +219,7 @@ int VpRuleDescriptor::operator < (const VpRuleDescriptor x) const { if (elementList < x.elementList) return 1; if (x.elementList < elementList) return 0; - return procedureName < procedureName; + return procedureName < x.procedureName; } VpRule::VpRule() : KeyedObjectRegister<VpRuleDescriptor>() {}