diff anagram/agcore/rule.cpp @ 6:607e3be6bad8

Adjust to the moving target called the C++ standard. Apparently nowadays it's not allowed to define an explicit copy constructor but not an assignment operator. Consequently, defining the explicit copy constructor in terms of the implicit/automatic assignment operator for general convenience no longer works. Add assignment operators. Caution: not tested with the IBM compiler, but there's no particular reason it shouldn't work.
author David A. Holland
date Mon, 30 May 2022 23:46:22 -0400
parents 13d2b8934445
children
line wrap: on
line diff
--- a/anagram/agcore/rule.cpp	Mon May 30 23:32:56 2022 -0400
+++ b/anagram/agcore/rule.cpp	Mon May 30 23:46:22 2022 -0400
@@ -44,6 +44,9 @@
 Rule::Rule() : ObjectRegister<RuleDescriptor>() {}
 Rule::Rule(int x) : ObjectRegister<RuleDescriptor>(x) {}
 Rule::Rule(const Rule &t) : ObjectRegister<RuleDescriptor>(t) {}
+void Rule::operator = (const Rule &t) {
+   ObjectRegister<RuleDescriptor>::operator = (t);
+}
 
   
 RuleDescriptor &Rule::Map::operator [] (unsigned x) {
@@ -216,7 +219,7 @@
 int VpRuleDescriptor::operator < (const VpRuleDescriptor x) const {
   if (elementList < x.elementList) return 1;
   if (x.elementList < elementList) return 0;
-  return procedureName < procedureName;
+  return procedureName < x.procedureName;
 }
 
 VpRule::VpRule() : KeyedObjectRegister<VpRuleDescriptor>() {}