<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!DOCTYPE webpage
  PUBLIC "-//NetBSD//DTD Website-based NetBSD Extension//EN"
	"http://www.NetBSD.org/XML/htdocs/lang/share/xml/website-netbsd.dtd" [

<!ENTITY % developers.ent SYSTEM "../../share/xml/developers.ent"> %developers.ent;

]>

<webpage id="foundation-reports-2003">
<config param="desc" value="The NetBSD Foundation 2003 Annual Report"/>
<config param="cvstag" value="$NetBSD: 2003.xml,v 1.2 2007/06/09 12:33:47 dsieger Exp $"/>
<config param="rcsdate" value="$Date: 2007/06/09 12:33:47 $"/>
<head>
<title>The NetBSD Foundation 2003 Annual Report</title>
</head>

<sect1 id="introduction">
<title>Introduction</title>

<para>
On February 7th 2004, The NetBSD Foundation had its annual meeting,
and here's a report on what happened in the past, what's in for the
future, where we stand WRT the 2.0 release and many other things
of general interest.
</para>

<para>
This report gives a general overview on what happened in NetBSD in the
past year, and then goes into details from each of the groups inside
NetBSD to detail status of what was, is and will be. 
</para>
</sect1>

<sect1 id="general-overview">

<title>General overview of happenings in the past NetBSD year</title>

<para>
First thing to note was the tenth anniversary year of the NetBSD
Project. Over the past ten years, hundreds of people have come to
develop a world-class freely redistributable operating system,
NetBSD. Other groups have done the same, but NetBSD as a project was
one of the first to try, and has done a good job.
</para>

<para>
NetBSD started as a group of people who wanted to do something
useful, and while most of the growth of NetBSD is spurred by
similar-minded volunteers, NetBSD hasn't been limited to
hobbyists. Companies have used NetBSD to build products, numerous engineers
are employed building things with and based on NetBSD, and the NetBSD
project helped save people a lot of time and effort, by both producing
a good operating system, but also through tools like pkgsrc which help
system administrators do their jobs more easily.
</para>

<para>
Before going into detail on the various subgroups, let's mention a few
achievements of the NetBSD Foundation from the past year. First is
that we now have an active Board of Directors, elected by members of
the Foundation, i.e. developers of the NetBSD project. Along with
that, policies have been put to papers to create a better decision
making process in the Foundation. There's also a new Core team in
place, to guide the technical direction of the project even better
than before. 
</para>

<para>
Another important thing to run the project is that the NetBSD Project
has applied for US Internal Revenue Code 501(c)(3) tax-exempt
non-profit status, and as of January 22nd 2004, the NetBSD Foundation
is a 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organization, which will ease donations to
the Foundation. 
</para>

<para>
Besides project financials the Foundation has also worked successfully
towards registering the <quote>NetBSD</quote> trademark, and a similar
undergoing for registering the <quote>pkgsrc</quote> trademark is in
process to get appropriate recognition for the work done on the pkgsrc
framework and it's now more than 4,400 packages. 
</para>

<para>
Great progress was made in the technical development arena, in particular
the scheduler activations-based threads, the sysctl interface, better
toolchain (compiler) support, Java, ports to new platforms, and a lot
of work in pkgsrc, like pkgviews and buildlink.
</para>

<para>
In the future, NetBSD will continue its tradition of technical
excellence by working toward the upcoming release, NetBSD 2.0,
complete with all the features that users are expecting, with 
multiprocessor support on common hardware and high-quality threading
being the two most important. 
</para>

<para>
Second, it is an important point of the NetBSD project to increase the
visibility of the operating system, of pkgsrc, and of the NetBSD
Foundation. Everyone is welcome to publish high-quality information
like articles, papers and other documentation, and participate in
community events such as conferences, that help people learn about
NetBSD. Getting people to know about NetBSD will help them build
better products and do their jobs better and more efficiently. And it
will get the NetBSD project more users, and more developers, which in
turn helps NetBSD to grow and improve.
</para>

<para>
Finally, problems that might harm NetBSD in the long term have to be
addressed. Management of the NetBSD Foundation, continuing the high
standard of technical leadership guiding NetBSD and pkgsrc development
are key issues. Licensing is also important so vendors wishing to
distribute NetBSD can comply more easily.
</para>

<para>
The following sections will go into details for all the groups within
the NetBSD project and their reporting of status.
</para>
</sect1>

<sect1 id="board">
<title>The Board of The NetBSD Foundation</title>

<para>
&a.cgd; reported about activities in NetBSD's project
management, the NetBSD Board of Directors.  The NetBSD Board of
Directors gets its members elected for a period of two
years. Two of the now-former board members then had their term finish
at the date of the meeting, and two new members filled their position.
</para>

<para>
Former board members that led the NetBSD project through the past were
&a.scottr; and &a.agc;, and with the new board members
&a.gendalia; and &a.wennmach;, the new board consists of
(alphabetical order):
</para>

<itemizedlist>
<listitem>&a.cgd;</listitem>
<listitem>&a.lukem;, Vice President and Secretary</listitem>
<listitem>&a.wennmach;, Treasurer</listitem>
<listitem>&a.gendalia;</listitem>
<listitem>&a.christos;, President and Assistant Treasurer</listitem>
</itemizedlist>

<para>
In order to get better organization and better decision-making
capabilities, Executive Committees (ECs) and Project Management
Committees (PMCs) were formed.
</para>
</sect1>

<sect1 id="membership">
<title>Membership Executive Committee</title>

<para>
&a.wennmach; gave the report on the project's "human resources"
department. Notable things here includes a standardized membership
application procedure, including a step where NetBSD developers are
formally asked for comments to be considered before making a
membership offer. New developers are now required to have PGP keys
which are signed by at least one current NetBSD developer on a public
key server. In the past year, 20 new membership applications
were processed (and accepted). A list of "active members" is
established for voting and elections, and accounts of inactive
developers are currently being closed. 
</para>

<para>
Things currently being worked on are a new membership agreement form as well
as documentation on PGP key management for developers. 
</para>
</sect1>

<sect1 id="finance">
<title>Finance Executive Committee</title>

<para>
The Finance Committee maintains the financial records of the
foundation, pays bills, accepts and documents donations, and files
financial forms. The report was given by &a.christos;.
</para>

<para>
The most important milestone, conversion of the Foundation to a
501(c)(3)  publicly funded, non-profit organization was already
mentioned above. In addition, the "NetBSD" trademark application has been
published for opposition, and will soon be completed
<ulink url="http://tarr.uspto.gov/servlet/tarr?regser=serial&amp;entry=78-025507">see the application</ulink> for more information.
</para>

<para>
The financial status of the project is better than previous years
thanks to many generous donations.  In addition since the last annual
meeting the number of donors increased significantly, while the amount
of individual donation amounts dropped. This is a desirable change
because it asserts that the NetBSD project can maintain a certain
level of donations without depending on large individual
contributions.
</para>

<para>
Expenses last year (2003) were:
</para>

<itemizedlist>
<listitem>Corporate fees</listitem>
<listitem>Taxes</listitem>
<listitem>CVS server purchase</listitem>
<listitem>RealWeasel purchase</listitem>
<listitem>501(c)(3) application form</listitem>
</itemizedlist>

<para>
Plans for this year (2004) include purchase of:
</para>

<itemizedlist>
<listitem>four 1U servers</listitem>
<listitem>SSL certificates</listitem>
</itemizedlist>

<para>
Everyone is welcome to keep donations coming. Donations are accepted
via check or paypal. See <ulink
url="http://www.NetBSD.org/donations/">http://www.NetBSD.org/donations/</ulink>
for details.
</para>
</sect1>

<sect1 id="servers">
<title>Servers and Service Administration</title>

<para>
&a.gendalia; works in the team of administrators who "establish
guidance over and are responsible for the operation of
the services and servers used to develop and distribute
the products of the Foundation."
</para>

<para>
Other projects' security problems caused a reevaluation of the
architecture of the NetBSD project's services. Among other things, SSH
protocol 1 access as well as password based access are now disabled on
all machines, and shell access to the CVS server is
restricted. Software like cvs, ssh and others was upgraded numerous
times to keep them up-to-date and avoid security problems. 
</para>

<para>
The machines of the release engineering group were moved from New York
City to the machine rack kindly provided by the Internet Systems
Consortium (ISC) which gives them a lot more bandwidth. A new and
faster CVS server was bought, configured and installed at ISC too, and
the Mail server was moved from Redback Networks to the ISC as
well. There's also progress towards a standardized machine
configuration based on the latest stable release of our fine operating
system.
</para>

<para>
Call duties for admins is now handled by a rotation scheme, with one
admin being "on call" for a week. 
</para>

<para>
Plans for this year include a new console server, web, mail and admin
server, moving to a ticket tracking system and getting more people
involved.
</para>
</sect1>

<sect1 id="communication">
<title>NetBSD Communication and Publicity Committee</title>

<para>
&a.lukem; talked about the Communications EC. Activities in the
past year included updates on the web site about donations and the
NetBSD Foundation, as well as setup of regional mailing lists, see
the regional-* lists at
<ulink
url="http://www.NetBSD.org/gallery/groups.html#regionallists">http://www.NetBSD.org/gallery/groups.html#regionallists</ulink>.
</para>

<para>
A logo design contest was announced with more than 100 submissions
three weeks before the competition closes - outcome of this will be
made public when the competition is closed and a new logo has been chosen.
</para>
</sect1>

<sect1 id="www">
<title>The WWW Group</title>

<para>
&a.jschauma; talked about the "WWW" group, which maintains the NetBSD
project's web-presence, but also acts as the first point of contact
for many users by performing what might qualify as ``customer-service''
or ``tech-support'' by answering every incoming mail to www@NetBSD.org
quickly, politely and of course accurately.
</para>

<para>
Many of the goals established in last year's meeting were achieved,
among them are better internal documentation, updating a wide variety
of documentation (e.g. building), and moving towards a better
documentation framework based on XML.  Ownership of the NetBSD Guide was
taken and TNF licensed as well as getting it up to date - several
chapters have undergone major work and corrections, several chapters
have been written from scratch and been added to the NetBSD Guide. Initiative
and leading this project was taken by &a.jrf;.
</para>

<para>
For the coming year, the plan is to provide more accurate information
for mirror maintainers (esp. for anoncvs), simplifying maintenance of
ports-pages for port-master, XMLizing all documents, bringing
translations of the NetBSD Guide up to date as well as improving
communication with other teams.
</para>

<para>
Other issues that need addressing are the Projects Server (<ulink
url="http://projects.NetBSD.org/" />),
fine-tuning CVS access, improving the mailing list archives, making
public keys for developers (PGP) and machines and mirrors (SSH)
available online, working more tightly with developers and other teams
for press releases and news announcements as well as general advocacy
by making printed documentation available for trade shows, e.g. via
some web shop. 
</para>
</sect1>

<sect1 id="technical">
<title>Committee for Technical Development</title>

<para>
&a.agc; gave this introduction to how technical development is
managed.  The committee for technical development is the board
committee which oversees the technical development of the project.
There are four Project Management Committees, or PMCs, which tech-exec
oversees. These are (in no special order except importance):
</para>

<itemizedlist>
<listitem>pkgsrc</listitem>
<listitem>security-officer</listitem>
<listitem>release engineering</listitem>
<listitem>core</listitem>
</itemizedlist>

<sect2 id="pkgsrc">

<title>Report of the pkgsrc Project Management Committee</title>
 
<para> 
The pkgsrc PMC is the Project Management Committee which oversees the
development of pkgsrc, NetBSD's third-party packages system. In the last
year, pkgsrc gained 919 new packages, and many packages were updated
numerous times.
</para> 

<para> 
Over the last year, we have seen two branches in pkgsrc.  A branch is
created differently to that of the other modules in the CVS
repository, since pkgsrc's needs are slightly different to the others,
so the pkgsrc team just freezes the trunk, fix things, and then branch
when the time is right. Branch names are netbsd-1-6-1 for the 1.6.1
release as well as netbsd-2003Q4 branch, which will be included in
1.6.2.
</para> 

<para> 
Much work has taken place on porting pkgsrc to other platforms.  The
current list of platforms supported (to a greater or lesser degree)
AIX, BSD/OS, Darwin, FreeBSD, IRIX, Linux, NetBSD, OpenBSD, Solaris.
</para> 

<para> 
There are also patches in gnats for the Hurd and HP/UX. Preliminary
patches may or may not be available for Digital UNIX.
</para> 

<para> 
Plans for the future include the aim to branch pkgsrc every 3 months.
The reasons for this are ease of branch maintenance, branches which
are up to date, and binary package management. Support will be given for
trunk and last branch of pkgsrc. Procedure for the branches will be a
two-week (maximum) freeze period for pkgsrc, after that time it's
branched and "shipped". Plans for the next year are:
</para> 

<itemizedlist>
<listitem>branch pkgsrc-2004Q1 in early March 2004, which will include some
   buildlink3, libtool 1.6, kde 3.2, gnome 2.4 etc. as well as
   self-hosting pkgsrc (i.e. integration of bootstrap-pkgsrc).</listitem>
<listitem>branching pkgsrc-2004Q2 in early June 2004, with complete
   buildlink3 </listitem>
<listitem>branching pkgsrc-2004Q3 in early September 2004 to 
	include pkgviews</listitem>
<listitem>branching pkgsrc-2004Q4 in early December 2004</listitem>
</itemizedlist>

<para> 
Work in progress include buildlink3 by Johnny Lam, including a
developer's guide published to tech-pkg@ with a more up-to-date
version available in pkgsrc/mk/buildlink3/BUILDLINK3_DG.
</para> 

<para> 
Pkgviews is still an experimental addition to pkgsrc and is not yet
supported.  There is a user's guide published to tech-pkg@, and a more
up-to-date version is available at pkgsrc/mk/buildlink3/PKGVIEWS_UG.
</para> 

<para> 
Bootstrap is a project to merge bootstrap-pkgsrc into pkgsrc itself so
that the pkgsrc tree is in some sense "self-hosting", meaning that
users on all platforms will only need to download a single tarball to
get up and running.  This is an active project being developed by a
small working group of developers who have just finished the design
phase.  The implementation is slated for completion by the 2004Q1
branch-point.
</para> 

<para> 
There are several other items worth mentioning. The <quote>pkgsrc</quote>
trademark was already mentioned above. Regular bulk build runs through all
pkgs in pkgsrc are done, which take 5-6 days for a full build on fast i386
machines right now. The builds are done on the latest stable OS
release as well as on NetBSD-current to identify and eliminate
problems early.
</para> 

<para> 
pkgsrc-wip was invoked by &a.wiz; as a SourceForge project
where people (usually those without NetBSD developer accounts) can
commit packages easily, for review and later moving 
into pkgsrc.  See <ulink url="http://pkgsrc-wip.sourceforge.net/">sourceforge</ulink> for more
information.
</para> 
</sect2>

<sect2 id="security">
<title>Security-Officer Team</title>

<para>
&a.david; spoke for the NetBSD Security-Officer Team. First David gave an
overview of their work areas, which are both proactive and reactive. Proactive
measures include development of tools for handling reactive part of the job,
encouraging good security practices by developers, auditing sources for
additional instances of reported problems as well as encouraging availability
of good security tools in NetBSD.
</para>

<para>
List of things the security team reacts to is quite long and includes
handling mail to the security-officer mail address, with a target
response time of less than 24 hours, investigation of vulnerability
reports coordinated with 3rd parties like CERT, FreeBSD
security-officers and individual security researchers. Problems in
NetBSD are coordinated with experts on the subject, who do analysis
and resolve flaws. Other teams to coordinate with are admins to keep the
NetBSD project machines' security up to date as well as the release
engineering crew for pulling possible security changes into release
branches.  Ongoing research and discussions are followed, and queries
to the tech-security mailing list are responded to. Problems addressed
are documented publicly by publishing security advisories.
</para>

<para>
Goals from last year that we've met include binary patches for
advisories, re-organizing the Security Advisory publishing process,
getting PGP keys for all developers, keeping security-related webpages
up to date, improve mail response time and advisory publishing time and
improving internal project tracking and communications. 
</para>

<para>
Goals for this year include more binary patches for a larger number of
Security Advisories, add tools to track responsiveness of the security
officers and for tracking ongoing issues, publish host and PGP keys,
sign releases, issuing quick "security notes" like 'NetBSD is not
affected' on issues which won't result in a Security Advisory (SA),
working toward secure infrastructure for real-time communication
between developers as well as recruiting more volunteers to help
handle non-confidential issues, and contribute time to handle
less critical flaws which are public and not yet SA'd
and to followup with CERT and provide NetBSD references
for older CERT issues. 
</para>

<para>
One of the big problems this year was that, in many cases, the security
team received late (less than 24h) or no notification before information about
the security issue was made public.
</para>

<para>
Possible areas where technical development for security is possible:
</para>

<itemizedlist>
<listitem>Suggest and perform security sweeps for your pet issues</listitem>
<listitem>Review PRs in security category and send status updates</listitem>
<listitem>Generate example systrace policies for system daemons</listitem>
<listitem>Write rc tweaks to run more daemons unpriv'd/chroot/etc.</listitem>
<listitem>Stomp out more suid programs</listitem>
<listitem>Write release signature/verification tools</listitem>
<listitem>Find a nice solution to the "local mail must work" problem
   without having sendmail or postfix listening outside</listitem>
<listitem>Bring your PGP fingerprint on a piece of paper to NetBSD
   social events so people can sign it later!</listitem>
</itemizedlist>

</sect2>

<sect2 id="releng">
<title>Release Engineering</title>

<para>
&a.cyber; gave the report for the team handling releases of NetBSD.
At the time of the presentation, the team was busy with preparing the
NetBSD 1.6.2 release, with much of the work done by &a.jmc;.
</para>

<para>
Major achievements last year:
</para>
<itemizedlist>
<listitem>NetBSD 1.6.1 released</listitem>
<listitem>The netbsd-1-5 branch is still in maintenance mode</listitem>
<listitem>The team is in the final stages of kicking 1.6.2 out the door</listitem>
<listitem>The releng team took on maintaining, doing pullups for the pkgsrc
   branches</listitem>
<listitem>Improved autobuild</listitem>
<listitem>Releng machines were moved to a better location (in conjunction
   with admins)</listitem>
</itemizedlist>

<para>
Plans for this year:
</para>
<itemizedlist>
<listitem>Kick 2.0 out the door</listitem>
<listitem>Kick 1.6.3 out the door</listitem>
<listitem>Refine policy</listitem>
<listitem>Improve autobuild some more</listitem>
<listitem>Add more autobuild workhorses (in conjunction with admins)</listitem>
</itemizedlist>

<para>
Things we planned to do, but were not able to complete are adding
additional req queues for 2.0 and pkgsrc, and the autobuild mechanism
to (cross)compile NetBSD for all platforms on a daily base could be
tuned more.
</para>
</sect2>

<sect2 id="core">
<title>NetBSD OS 'Core' development team</title>

<para>
The Core team traditionally managed all technical development of
NetBSD. With the new structure of the NetBSD Foundation in place,
overseeing pkgsrc, release engineering and security issues is now handled
to separate groups, and <quote>Core</quote> is now back to managing
technical development of the NetBSD operating system itself. Luke Mewburn
gave the report of the Core group.
</para>

<para>
Core is now a project management committee (PMC) under technical-exec,
for the maintenance of the core <quote>open-source</quote> operating system
software products.
</para>

<para>
Some technical highlights:
</para>
<itemizedlist>
<listitem>Build.sh overhaul</listitem>
<listitem>Cross-buildable X11 (integrated into build.sh)</listitem>
<listitem>Toolchain update; gcc 3.3.2, gdb 5.3</listitem>
<listitem>Dynamic sysctl</listitem>
<listitem>Thread improvements</listitem>
<listitem>Many programs updated</listitem>
<listitem>Storage: smbfs, FFSv2, vinum</listitem>
<listitem>Improved buffer cache memory allocation</listitem>
<listitem>Non executable mappings on many platforms</listitem>
<listitem>many others</listitem>
</itemizedlist>

<para>
Things that need to be addressed for the NetBSD 2.0 release include:
</para>

<itemizedlist>
<listitem>GNATS audit with the goal of having no open PRs in
   the high or medium states going into a release cycle</listitem>
<listitem>gcc 3.3.2 for sh3, sh5, vax</listitem>
<listitem>gdb 5.3 for hppa, ns32k, sh5</listitem>
<listitem>sigtramp: Gdb goes not handle the new signal trampoline
   so w cannot debug through signal handlers</listitem>
<listitem>Longjmp uses deprecated __sigreturn14.  Programs that use
   longjmp will not work unless COMPAT_16 is defined.
   To fix: hppa, m68k, mips, sh5, sparc, sparc64, vax.</listitem>
<listitem>siginfo: Not supported yet on hppa, mips, ns32k, sh3.</listitem>
<listitem>and whatever releng needs</listitem>
</itemizedlist>

</sect2>
</sect1>

<sect1 id="closing">
<title>Closing</title>

<para>
This report gives an overview of past, present and future of the
NetBSD Project, the NetBSD operating system, pkgsrc and the NetBSD
Foundation both in general and from the perspective of each group, to
give users and people interested in the NetBSD project insight into
the project. Please join our mailing lists for participating in
ongoing discussion, and see our web site for more information about
the NetBSD project, <ulink url="http://www.NetBSD.org/" />.
</para>

<para>
&a.hubertf; <email>hubertf@NetBSD.org</email>,
Communications Executive Committee,
The NetBSD Foundation
</para>

</sect1>
<parentsec url="../" text="the NetBSD Foundation Inc. page"/>
</webpage>
